![gay sex party san diego gay sex party san diego](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/xVa-hFNIpN8/maxresdefault.jpg)
Wed, Thurs, Fri, Sat. The earlier you arrive, the quicker the fun can start. Thads members are invited to attend every Wed, Thurs, Fri, Sat. Call 61 after 4pm to speak with the hostess and to get an invitation for that evening. The Premier Private Social ( Swingers ) Club in San Diego. Thads social club is an on-premise facility with plenty of private rooms, group rooms, couples only area, pool table, dance floor, two dance poles, pool and jacuzzi. “This is a dangerous play against and science, and it will have massive implications on women and girls in San Diego by changing the historic and scientific definition to include men, and now force women to seek shelter with men, to lose women’s scholarships to men, to lose women’s jobs to men, to compete in collegiate women’s sports with men, and to even be jailed with men.”Ĭounty supervisors will take up the issue again next month.Thads, the ONLY Licensed Swingers Club in San Diego.Ĭouples, single ladies, and single men attend our parties every Wed, Thurs, Fri, Sat, Sun. “This radically redefines men as women and boys as girls,” Maher said during the meeting. international human rights treaty was about equality for women rather than today’s push for “equity.” San Diego resident Brittany Maher said the intent of the 1979 U.N. “Planned Parenthood … urges your support in order to move our region closer to achieving gender equity and removing the barriers faced by so many women and girls, including women of color, and those who identify as transgender, non-binary, and gender non-conforming,” Vernita Gutierrez, who spoke on behalf the organization’s Pacific Southwest division, said during the meeting. Those who spoke in favor were county employees and those from nonprofits for women and girls, as well as other organizations like Planned Parenthood. “And that in itself I think is discriminatory towards women.”ĭuring the meeting, 75 San Diego County residents voiced their opinion, primarily against the ordinance, and nearly 500 other comments-mostly against the ordinance-were left on the county’s website. “In my opinion, it’s taking away from biological women,” Desmond said. Supervisor Jim Desmond, who also voted against the ordinance, said a new definition of “women” would give males who identify as female an “open door” to take away opportunities for women in sports and academia.
![gay sex party san diego gay sex party san diego](https://cdn.gaystarnews.com/uploads/2016/11/Gay_bar_1.jpg)
“I’m also worried that in the wrong hands, this may weaponize, where we should be coming together, but it may be used to purge people or to go after folks,” Anderson said. Supervisor Joel Anderson, who voted against the motion, called the ordinance “aggressive” and said it would move women’s equality in the wrong direction.Īnderson said he is worried about the ordinance’s implication on Title IX, the federal civil rights law that prohibits sex-based discrimination in government-funded education institutes. The ordinance, which would only apply to county departments and programs, claims to address employment barriers and discrimination in the legal system, help educate women about their voting rights, and combat gender-based violence and harassment, according to its text. “I want to make sure that we emphasize that in this ordinance, it’s very clear that women and girls refer to those who identify as women and girls, including transgender women, gender non-conforming, and those assigned female at birth, who include non-binary, transgender men, and intersex communities,” Supervisor Nora Vargas said during the meeting. However, county officials have revised the original treaty by including biological males who identify as female. The supervisors approved the first reading of the local ordinance, which would be based on the U.N.’s Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, a human rights treaty penned 40 years ago. San Diego County supervisors voted 3–2 on April 26 in favor of creating an ordinance that redefines the word “women” to include biological males who identify as women, despite an overwhelming show of opposition from the public.